Category analysis

The category has solved finding. It has not solved proving.

The most useful conclusions are not small differences in rank. They are the recurring evidence, accuracy and remediation gaps across the market.

F-01

Accuracy is measured in the literature and almost never published by vendors

Across the fourteen scored products, one publishes per-detector figures for its own product and one open-source toolchain has been independently benchmarked. The rest ask buyers to act on inventories without a published error rate. S23S26

F-02

Signing the evidence remains rare

Most products emit a CycloneDX bill of materials. Two are documented as producing a cryptographically verifiable record, and one publishes a key and a procedure a stranger can use without contacting the vendor. S02S05

F-03

Discovery has converged; downstream execution has not

Discovery breadth has the highest field mean. The meaningful separation now appears in evidence integrity, change handling, risk quantification and remediation after an inventory exists.

F-04

The best functional products and the best-assured vendors differ

Capability leadership and certification or deployment assurance rarely sit in the same company, forcing buyers to evaluate technical performance and vendor approval as separate decisions. S11S12S13

F-05

Remediation is the criterion where QScout does not lead

AppViewX and Keyfactor document bidirectional workflow and certificate lifecycle capabilities that QScout does not yet demonstrate against a live ticketing tenant. S24S25

Where QScout is weak

Remediation loop, 8/10. The inbound path exists in code, but the report says it has not completed a round trip against a live ticketing tenant. This rests on code presence, not observed tenant behaviour. S03

Change detection, 9/10. Nine of fourteen materialized events were signed and hash-chained. The reported two-to-three-millisecond value is pipeline materialization time, not the delay between a target change and discovery. The observed window is roughly 52 minutes against a 24-hour target. S02

Correctness, 8/10. The published 1,368-case corpus reports recall of 0.7628, below the QScout.s own integration floor. Labels were not independently human-annotated. S02S23

Assurance, not scored. The report states that Qtonic Quantum Corp has no company-held product certification; infrastructure-provider certifications are inherited controls, not Qtonic attestations. S01

Four withdrawn Qtonic Quantum claims

These exclusivity claims were previously made by Qtonic Quantum Corp and are contradicted by competitor evidence. Keeping them visible is part of the correction record.

Withdrawn claimCorrectionSources
Only product emitting CycloneDX 1.7CBOM Secure and another listed scanner document CycloneDX 1.7 output.S06S20
Only tamper-evident cryptographic historyCBOM Secure documents a cryptographically verifiable asset-change log.S05
Only per-finding reachability modelCBOM Secure documents cross-file call-graph reachability.S04
Only quantitative harvest-now-decrypt-later modelCBOM Secure and O3 Security both document quantitative prioritization models.S05S17