C1 / 21.05% of index

Discovery

How broadly and deeply does the product find cryptographic assets?

What is discovery?

Cryptographic discovery identifies certificates, keys, algorithms, protocols, libraries and cryptographic dependencies across code, infrastructure, networks, endpoints and cloud services.

A post-quantum migration plan cannot govern assets it has not found. Breadth matters, but buyers also need evidence about false negatives and the vantage points from which discovery occurred.

Questions to ask a vendor

  1. Which asset classes and environments are enumerated?
  2. What cannot be observed from the deployed vantage points?
  3. Is recall measured against independently constructed ground truth?

What this edition actually supports

Weight 4 of 19. What cryptography can the named product actually find, and on which surfaces?

The review looks for product-specific evidence across source, dependencies, endpoints, networks, certificates, keys and cloud systems. A vendor's inventory claim is evidence of documentation, not proof of complete detection. QScout scores 8 in edition 2026.7; CBOM Secure and SandboxAQ each score 10 on this criterion. Unconnected systems and unknown implementation patterns can remain invisible.

How to investigate this criterion

Open each product's C1 rationale, cited primary pages and the surface-by-surface limits. Ask for a common labelled corpus before claiming superior recall.

The 2026.7 cells below are public-evidence scores. A vendor page documents a claim; an artifact check tests only its stated scope. Missing product execution and inaccessible sources remain explicit unknowns. The score snapshot has not been recomputed from later pages.

Discovery scores in edition 2026.7

Equal scores share the same criterion position; the next position skips the tied places. The highest value in this column is a published rubric cell, not a measured product winner. A partial or unverified source anchor remains visible even when its numeric score is high.

Position on criterionProductDiscovery scoreOverall scoreInternal 1 October source reviewEvidence
1CBOM SecureEncryption Consulting107.47Partial or qualified supportVendor quote enumerates many surfaces; parameter depth and hybrid detection rely on an inaccessible datasheet and remain documentation-only.Exact cell and citationsS04S05S06
1SandboxAQ AQtive GuardSandboxAQ106.21Partial or qualified supportVendor docs support broad discovery and hybrid TLS, but all seven-plus surfaces/depth are not jointly validated in one test.Exact cell and citationsS12
3Keyfactor AgileSec + CommandKeyfactor96.53Partial or qualified supportHybrid group handling is documented, but full surface count and parameter depth require multi-document reconciliation.Exact cell and citationsS08S25
3QCecuring CBOMQCecuring96.53Partial or qualified supportAlgorithm/key-size quote supports depth, but scored surface count and hybrid handling depend on other pages.Exact cell and citationsS19
3Fortanix Key Insight / PQC CentralFortanix95.74Partial or qualified supportVendor documents multiple connector/surface types; cited Zeek quote alone is not a complete depth/hybrid proof.Exact cell and citationsS15
6AppViewX Quantum Trust HubAppViewX8.56.37Claim not verified from accessible evidenceAll five vendor documentation URLs returned 403; surface-count/depth cannot be independently checked.Exact cell and citationsS07S24
7QScout Pulse GoldQtonic Quantum Corp88.00Partial or qualified supportVendor modules document eight surfaces but active production coverage and parameter depth across all eight are not demonstrated.Exact cell and citationsS27S28S29S30
7IBM Guardium + Quantum SafeIBM85.58Partial or qualified supportIBM lists source-code languages; the 5-6-surface count relies on additional product documents and no common runtime test.Exact cell and citationsS09S10S26
7ISARA AdvanceISARA85.42Partial or qualified supportVendor lists many surfaces broadly; independently checked detail is insufficient for exact 5-6-surface depth anchor.Exact cell and citationsS14
7TYCHON Quantum CommandTYCHON85.16Claim not verified from accessible evidenceVendor product pages returned 403; third-party Elastic PR does not establish scored surface count/depth.Exact cell and citationsS11
11O3 SecurityO3 Security75.47Partial or qualified supportVendor lists code/libraries/binaries/configurations; 5-6 surfaces and algorithm depth are not independently enumerated.Exact cell and citationsS17
12DigiCert Quantum CentralDigiCert65.37Partial or qualified supportHybrid group support is documented; the single quote does not itself prove the scored number of discovery surfaces.Exact cell and citationsS18
12CryptoNext COMPASSCryptoNext64.68Partial or qualified supportPrimary Network Probe PDF confirms TLS/SSH/ISAKMP and parameters; archived longer protocol list and cross-surface count need further corroboration.Exact cell and citationsS16
14QuSecure QuProtect R3QuSecure45.21Partial or qualified supportReconnaissance documents network-negotiated algorithms/certs; exact one-to-two surface boundary is a rubric judgment.Exact cell and citationsS13