C1 / 21.05% of index
Discovery
How broadly and deeply does the product find cryptographic assets?
What is discovery?
Cryptographic discovery identifies certificates, keys, algorithms, protocols, libraries and cryptographic dependencies across code, infrastructure, networks, endpoints and cloud services.
A post-quantum migration plan cannot govern assets it has not found. Breadth matters, but buyers also need evidence about false negatives and the vantage points from which discovery occurred.
Questions to ask a vendor
- Which asset classes and environments are enumerated?
- What cannot be observed from the deployed vantage points?
- Is recall measured against independently constructed ground truth?
What this edition actually supports
Weight 4 of 19. What cryptography can the named product actually find, and on which surfaces?
The review looks for product-specific evidence across source, dependencies, endpoints, networks, certificates, keys and cloud systems. A vendor's inventory claim is evidence of documentation, not proof of complete detection. QScout scores 8 in edition 2026.7; CBOM Secure and SandboxAQ each score 10 on this criterion. Unconnected systems and unknown implementation patterns can remain invisible.
How to investigate this criterion
Open each product's C1 rationale, cited primary pages and the surface-by-surface limits. Ask for a common labelled corpus before claiming superior recall.
Primary and original inputs: pqc-index.org · www.encryptionconsulting.com · api.qtonicquantum.com. Review all dated cell source checks and the 1 October per-cell limits.
The 2026.7 cells below are public-evidence scores. A vendor page documents a claim; an artifact check tests only its stated scope. Missing product execution and inaccessible sources remain explicit unknowns. The score snapshot has not been recomputed from later pages.
Discovery scores in edition 2026.7
Equal scores share the same criterion position; the next position skips the tied places. The highest value in this column is a published rubric cell, not a measured product winner. A partial or unverified source anchor remains visible even when its numeric score is high.
| Position on criterion | Product | Discovery score | Overall score | Internal 1 October source review | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CBOM SecureEncryption Consulting | 10 | 7.47 | Partial or qualified supportVendor quote enumerates many surfaces; parameter depth and hybrid detection rely on an inaccessible datasheet and remain documentation-only.Exact cell and citations | S04S05S06 |
| 1 | SandboxAQ AQtive GuardSandboxAQ | 10 | 6.21 | Partial or qualified supportVendor docs support broad discovery and hybrid TLS, but all seven-plus surfaces/depth are not jointly validated in one test.Exact cell and citations | S12 |
| 3 | Keyfactor AgileSec + CommandKeyfactor | 9 | 6.53 | Partial or qualified supportHybrid group handling is documented, but full surface count and parameter depth require multi-document reconciliation.Exact cell and citations | S08S25 |
| 3 | QCecuring CBOMQCecuring | 9 | 6.53 | Partial or qualified supportAlgorithm/key-size quote supports depth, but scored surface count and hybrid handling depend on other pages.Exact cell and citations | S19 |
| 3 | Fortanix Key Insight / PQC CentralFortanix | 9 | 5.74 | Partial or qualified supportVendor documents multiple connector/surface types; cited Zeek quote alone is not a complete depth/hybrid proof.Exact cell and citations | S15 |
| 6 | AppViewX Quantum Trust HubAppViewX | 8.5 | 6.37 | Claim not verified from accessible evidenceAll five vendor documentation URLs returned 403; surface-count/depth cannot be independently checked.Exact cell and citations | S07S24 |
| 7 | QScout Pulse GoldQtonic Quantum Corp | 8 | 8.00 | Partial or qualified supportVendor modules document eight surfaces but active production coverage and parameter depth across all eight are not demonstrated.Exact cell and citations | S27S28S29S30 |
| 7 | IBM Guardium + Quantum SafeIBM | 8 | 5.58 | Partial or qualified supportIBM lists source-code languages; the 5-6-surface count relies on additional product documents and no common runtime test.Exact cell and citations | S09S10S26 |
| 7 | ISARA AdvanceISARA | 8 | 5.42 | Partial or qualified supportVendor lists many surfaces broadly; independently checked detail is insufficient for exact 5-6-surface depth anchor.Exact cell and citations | S14 |
| 7 | TYCHON Quantum CommandTYCHON | 8 | 5.16 | Claim not verified from accessible evidenceVendor product pages returned 403; third-party Elastic PR does not establish scored surface count/depth.Exact cell and citations | S11 |
| 11 | O3 SecurityO3 Security | 7 | 5.47 | Partial or qualified supportVendor lists code/libraries/binaries/configurations; 5-6 surfaces and algorithm depth are not independently enumerated.Exact cell and citations | S17 |
| 12 | DigiCert Quantum CentralDigiCert | 6 | 5.37 | Partial or qualified supportHybrid group support is documented; the single quote does not itself prove the scored number of discovery surfaces.Exact cell and citations | S18 |
| 12 | CryptoNext COMPASSCryptoNext | 6 | 4.68 | Partial or qualified supportPrimary Network Probe PDF confirms TLS/SSH/ISAKMP and parameters; archived longer protocol list and cross-surface count need further corroboration.Exact cell and citations | S16 |
| 14 | QuSecure QuProtect R3QuSecure | 4 | 5.21 | Partial or qualified supportReconnaissance documents network-negotiated algorithms/certs; exact one-to-two surface boundary is a rubric judgment.Exact cell and citations | S13 |